| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/10/2006 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/08/2022 |
|
Autoria: |
FERRAZ, E. M. N.; SILVA, S. I. da; ARAÚJO, E. de L.; MELO, A. L. de. |
|
Título: |
Espécies lenhosas de interesse econômico na Mata Atlântica de Pernambuco: distribuição e relação entre formas de uso e abundância das populações. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2002 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: TABARELLI, M.; SILVA, J. M. C. da (Org.). Diagnóstico da biodiversidade de Pernambuco. Recife: Secretaria de Ciência e Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente: Fundação Joaquim Nabuco; Ed. Massangana, 2002. |
|
Volume: |
v. 2 |
|
Páginas: |
cap. 43, p. 689-696. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Distribuição; Espécie lenhosa; Forma de utilização; Mata Atlântica; Pernambuco; Potencial econômico. |
|
Thesagro: |
Planta; População. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Natural resources. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01009naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1133790
005 2022-08-08
008 2002 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFERRAZ, E. M. N.
245 $aEspécies lenhosas de interesse econômico na Mata Atlântica de Pernambuco$bdistribuição e relação entre formas de uso e abundância das populações.
260 $c2002
300 $acap. 43, p. 689-696. v. 2
490 $vv. 2
650 $aNatural resources
650 $aPlanta
650 $aPopulação
653 $aDistribuição
653 $aEspécie lenhosa
653 $aForma de utilização
653 $aMata Atlântica
653 $aPernambuco
653 $aPotencial econômico
700 1 $aSILVA, S. I. da
700 1 $aARAÚJO, E. de L.
700 1 $aMELO, A. L. de
773 $tIn: TABARELLI, M.; SILVA, J. M. C. da (Org.). Diagnóstico da biodiversidade de Pernambuco. Recife: Secretaria de Ciência e Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente: Fundação Joaquim Nabuco; Ed. Massangana, 2002.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/05/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/07/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MONJE, J.; LUNDBERG, D. S.; LAZAROVITS, G.; REIS, V. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOHNSTON MONGE, UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH,ONTÁRIO, CA; DEREK S. LUNDBERG, MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, GE; GEORGE LAZAROVITS, A&L BIOLOGICALS, AGROECOLOGY RESEARCH SERVICES CENTRE, ONTÁRIO, CA; VERONICA MASSENA REIS, CNPAB. |
|
Título: |
Bacterial populations in juvenile maize rhizospheres originate from both seed and soil |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Plant and Soil, v. 405, p. 447-355, 2016 |
|
ISSN: |
1573-5036 |
|
DOI: |
10.1007/s11104-016-2826-0 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Background and aims: To assess the impacts of soil microbes and plant genotype on the composition of maize associated bacterial communities.
Methods: Two genotypes of Brazilian maize were planted indoors on sterile sand, a deep underground subsoil, and a nutrient-rich topsoil from the Amazon jungle (terra preta). DNA was extracted from rhizospheres, phyllospheres, and surface sterilized roots for 16S rDNA fingerprinting and next generation sequencing.
Results: Neither plant genotype nor soil type appeared to influence bacterial diversity in phyllospheres or endospheres. Rhizospheres showed strikingly similar 16S rDNA ordination of both fingerprinting and sequencing data, with soil type driving grouping patterns and genotype having a significant impact only on sterile sand. Rhizospheres grown in non-sterile soils contained greater bacterial diversity than sterile-sand grown ones, however the dominant OTUs (species of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes) were found in all rhizospheres suggesting seeds as a common source of inoculum. Rhizospheres of the commercial hybrid appeared to contain less bacterial diversity than the landrace.
Conclusions: Maize rhizospheres receive diverse bacteria from soil, are influenced by the genotype or treatment of the seed, and are dominated by species of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. As many dominant 16S rDNA sequences were observed in rhizospheres grown in both sterile and non-sterile substrate, we conclude that the most common bacterial cells in juvenile maize rhizospheres are seed transmitted. MenosBackground and aims: To assess the impacts of soil microbes and plant genotype on the composition of maize associated bacterial communities.
Methods: Two genotypes of Brazilian maize were planted indoors on sterile sand, a deep underground subsoil, and a nutrient-rich topsoil from the Amazon jungle (terra preta). DNA was extracted from rhizospheres, phyllospheres, and surface sterilized roots for 16S rDNA fingerprinting and next generation sequencing.
Results: Neither plant genotype nor soil type appeared to influence bacterial diversity in phyllospheres or endospheres. Rhizospheres showed strikingly similar 16S rDNA ordination of both fingerprinting and sequencing data, with soil type driving grouping patterns and genotype having a significant impact only on sterile sand. Rhizospheres grown in non-sterile soils contained greater bacterial diversity than sterile-sand grown ones, however the dominant OTUs (species of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes) were found in all rhizospheres suggesting seeds as a common source of inoculum. Rhizospheres of the commercial hybrid appeared to contain less bacterial diversity than the landrace.
Conclusions: Maize rhizospheres receive diverse bacteria from soil, are influenced by the genotype or treatment of the seed, and are dominated by species of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. As many dominant 16S rDNA sequences were observed in rhizospheres grown in both sterile and non-sterile substrate, we conclude that t... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Endophyte; Epiphyte; Inoculation; Next-generation sequencing. |
|
Thesagro: |
Zea Mays. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Microbial ecology; Rhizosphere. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02301naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2044984
005 2016-07-27
008 2016 bl --- 0-- u #d
022 $a1573-5036
024 7 $a10.1007/s11104-016-2826-0$2DOI
100 1 $aMONJE, J.
245 $aBacterial populations in juvenile maize rhizospheres originate from both seed and soil
260 $c2016
520 $aBackground and aims: To assess the impacts of soil microbes and plant genotype on the composition of maize associated bacterial communities. Methods: Two genotypes of Brazilian maize were planted indoors on sterile sand, a deep underground subsoil, and a nutrient-rich topsoil from the Amazon jungle (terra preta). DNA was extracted from rhizospheres, phyllospheres, and surface sterilized roots for 16S rDNA fingerprinting and next generation sequencing. Results: Neither plant genotype nor soil type appeared to influence bacterial diversity in phyllospheres or endospheres. Rhizospheres showed strikingly similar 16S rDNA ordination of both fingerprinting and sequencing data, with soil type driving grouping patterns and genotype having a significant impact only on sterile sand. Rhizospheres grown in non-sterile soils contained greater bacterial diversity than sterile-sand grown ones, however the dominant OTUs (species of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes) were found in all rhizospheres suggesting seeds as a common source of inoculum. Rhizospheres of the commercial hybrid appeared to contain less bacterial diversity than the landrace. Conclusions: Maize rhizospheres receive diverse bacteria from soil, are influenced by the genotype or treatment of the seed, and are dominated by species of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. As many dominant 16S rDNA sequences were observed in rhizospheres grown in both sterile and non-sterile substrate, we conclude that the most common bacterial cells in juvenile maize rhizospheres are seed transmitted.
650 $aMicrobial ecology
650 $aRhizosphere
650 $aZea Mays
653 $aEndophyte
653 $aEpiphyte
653 $aInoculation
653 $aNext-generation sequencing
700 1 $aLUNDBERG, D. S.
700 1 $aLAZAROVITS, G.
700 1 $aREIS, V. M.
773 $tPlant and Soil$gv. 405, p. 447-355, 2016
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
